Suggestion d'un gouvernement ouvert à Charles Sirois (CAQ)

Charles Sirois
J'ai transmis aujourd'hui une suggestion de gouvernement ouvert à Charles Sirois, co-fondateur (avec François Legault) de la Coalition pour l'avenir du Québec. Leur site ne permet pas plus de 1000 caractères dans les formulations de propositions ou de moyens d'actions.

Un sondage Léger Marketing-Le Devoir révèle aujourd'hui 11 juin 2011 que les Québécois veulent François Legault. En effet, la coalition de l'ex-ministre péquiste récolte 12 points de plus que le Parti Québécois (PQ) et 13 de plus que le Parti libéral du Québec (PLQ). Le Devoir indique que la Coalition pour l'avenir du Québec (CAQ) récolte 33% des intentions de vote, le Parti québécois (PQ) 21%, le Parti libéral du Québec (PLQ) 20%, l'Action démocratique du Québec (ADQ) 11%, Québec solidaire (QS) 9% et le Parti vert du Québec (PVQ) 3%, après répartition des intentions de vote des indécis.

MA SUGGESTION
Publiée ici sur le site de la Coalition pour l'avenir du Québec

M. Sirois, vous indiquez: «Pour arriver à accroître la qualité, l’efficacité et la transparence de nos services publics, il nous faudra donc les décentraliser». Cela pourrait être notamment atteint par l'implantation d'un GOUVERNEMENT OUVERT au Québec, axé sur la transparence, participation et collaboration avec les citoyens. Un mandat d'analyse en cours du potentiel du Web 2.0 confié par Jean Charest à Henri-François Gautrin, écarte délibérément les possibilités de données ouvertes et gouvernement ouvert. Pourquoi? Yogi Berra recommande: «Quand vous voyez une fourchette sur la route, ramassez-la.» Le gouvernement actuel ne ramasse pas les fourchettes (qu'il voit pourtant clairement). Le Québec a autant de potentiel que n’importe quel autre pays, ayant pris le tournant d'un gouvernement ouvert. Il manque un leadership, une volonté d’améliorer la situation et de transformer le gouvernement. Lyne Robichaud, Trois-Rivières. (Je collabore avec GovintheLab.com)

Interview: Government of Quebec, about the potential of Web 2.0

Last month Government in the Lab announced (in Newsletter no.3) that the Government of Quebec is undertaking an analysis mandate of the potential of Web 2.0. The Deputy House leader, Henri-François Gautrin, kindly answered our questions.

1 - WHAT IS THE ANALYSIS MANDATE ABOUT THE POTENTIAL OF WEB 2.0?

Web 2.0 is based on three principles:

Decentralization: There is no formal structure in terms of both content and technology.

Participation: Web 2.0 exists because of the Internet.

Simplicity of use and technological breakthrough.

The Premier (Jean Charest) gave me the mandate to analyze the implications for Quebec society, especially for the Government, of using the increasingly popular Web 2.0 and social networks, and to propose strategic actions so that Quebec can draw on every possible advantage.

2 - WHAT WORK HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED TO DATE BY YOUR TEAM, AND WHAT IS PLANNED FOR UPCOMING MONTHS?

I proceed in four steps for the project:

* Consultation with people associated with government action.

* Discussions with Quebec citizens via the Internet (public community).

* A closed consultation on the Internet (private community).

* A conference.

We are currently setting up a website, which should be operational in early June 2011.

The conference is scheduled for early September.

The final report is to be submitted to the Prime Minister and the Government by the end of 2011.

3 - WHAT IS, ACCORDING TO YOU, A GOOD RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND CITIZENS?

A good relationship between government and citizens based on the use of Web 2.0 should improve:

* communications with citizens

* interactions with citizens

* services to citizens

Communications with citizens: increase citizen accessibility to government information. The use of blogs or microblogging, like Twitter, even Mashups, fall into this category. The goal is to bring government information closer to communication tools used by citizens, rather than requiring them to visit many Web pages.

Interactions with citizens: This is primarily to get feedback from citizens on policies and programs put forward by the government. It also allows managers to benefit from the wisdom of crowds to put forward new programs or new ideas.

It also allows officials to make their suggestions to improve the efficiency of their departments or agencies in how they fulfill their mission. I am thinking here, in particular, of using social media like Facebook.

4 - TRANSPARENCY, PARTICIPATION AND COLLABORATION WITH CITIZENS, THROUGH OPEN DATA AND OPEN GOVERNMENT, ARE THEY BEING CONSIDERED IN THIS CURRENT MANDATE?

Besides transparency, participation and collaboration with citizens, the use of Web 2.0 tools should:

* improve citizen participation, particularly in regards of policy making

* improve relevance and quality of services to citizens.

* enable access and more efficient use of government information

* improve internal operations and collaboration between different departments and agencies.